<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Information Literacy in the News</title>
      <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/</link>
      <description>Welcome to our blog! Here&apos;s a place to read about and discuss current issues in information literacy and how they may impact our lives and our understanding of intellectual property and other related issues. Do you think information literacy has no tangible meaning in our lives? Think again...</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2012</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:21:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=5.13-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Just why is plagiarism bad?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I saw this story on Yahoo just a day or two ago and I was surprised by what I think is the story’s message:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hPzGjoFyb4Nu_9ZbtQcJU6aRjhhQ">http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hPzGjoFyb4Nu_9ZbtQcJU6aRjhhQ</a></p>

<p>The point the author seems to make is  that the quality of papers bought online is remarkably poor compared to what students expect. Is the most disturbing thing about buying papers online the idea that the papers themselves are not very good? Nowhere in the article does the author even hint at the concept of academic dishonesty and the ramifications of plagiarism as an academic ethics problem. The real danger, the author points out, is that if you buy papers online, you might get caught and get a bad grade. Even worse is the author left out anything more the instructor at Sarah Lawrence College had to say about the “awful��? paper. Would the instructor really be more mortified by a poorly written paper (yet still original) rather than by one that was plagiarized or simply bought online? Shouldn’t the author have really warned about the dangers of academic dishonesty and how it cheapens the very fabric of a college education? Pipe dreams, I guess. Yahoo is just the place where many students get their news and stories like this help perpetuate rather immature attitudes towards higher education. Unless the subtext of the story is simply meant to be understood that plagiarism is bad. But I’m afraid the author does a poor job of explaining <em>why</em> it’s bad.</p>

<p>Dear readers, what do <em>you</em> think?<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2009/09/just_why_is_plagiarism_bad.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2009/09/just_why_is_plagiarism_bad.html</guid>
         <category>Educational Issues</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:21:28 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Whoa, Nellie! A super-extra fast Internet???</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Last week there were some reports that CERN, the world's largest particle physics lab located in Geneva, is prepared to reveal their newest addition to their impressive resume of technological breakthroughs. CERN is the very organization that created the Internet that we know and love today. But what they have done now is create a super-fast Internet to exchange enormous packets of data between research centers. How does this affect us? Well, if the world adopts this newer “grid��? as their web-surfing backbone, downloads of huge data packets will be done in seconds rather than minutes. But wait, that's not all!</p>

<p>3 hour movies downloaded in seconds? Full scale audio/visual real time holograms of teachers on another continent beamed into your classroom? Online gaming involving hundreds of players, if not thousands all at once? The possibilities are amazing, if not downright frightening.  I’ve always believed that the Internet would get faster and faster as technology progresses, but would that allow for more efficient criminal activity? Even the grid project director Tony Doyle acknowledges the unpredictable nature of such a possibility becoming reality: “The history of the internet shows you cannot predict its real impacts but we know they will be huge.��?</p>

<p>Huge indeed. What do you think?</p>

<p>Here’s the link to the story from TimesOnline.uk: <br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3689881.ece">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/science/article3689881.ece</a><br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2008/04/whoa_nellie_a_superextra_fast.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2008/04/whoa_nellie_a_superextra_fast.html</guid>
         <category>Emerging Technologies</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:56:41 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is wikipedia our most trusted news source?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench/news/3302/long-bet-winner-weblogs-vs-new-york">weblogs v. nytimes</a></p>

<blockquote>Winer predicted a news environment "changed so thoroughly that informed people will look to amateurs they trust for the information they want." Nisenholtz expected the professional media to remain the authoritative source for "unbiased, accurate, and coherent" information.

<p>Instead, our most trusted source on the biggest news stories of 2007 is a horde of nameless, faceless amateurs who are not required to prove expertise in the subjects they cover.</blockquote></p>

<p>While far from rigorous research, the results of this 'long bet' indicate that people looking for information on top news stories go to wikipedia first, then blogs, then to the traditional media. Who do you trust?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/12/is_wikipedia_our_most_trusted.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/12/is_wikipedia_our_most_trusted.html</guid>
         <category>Authority</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:16:49 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Are (Printed) Books Passe?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times published an article this past Thursday (page C1) about the emergence of electronic books. While electronic books have been touted for the last decade or so, this article wonders if they might actually gain prominence this time around, as Amazon.com and Google are two key players. Amazon plans to unveil Kindle in October, "an electronic book reader...[that] will be priced at $400-$500 and will wirelessly connect to an e-book store on Amazon's site." Goggle will charge users for access to some  digital books, sharing the profits with publishers.  The currently available Sony Reader, which costs about $300, can hold up to 80 books and the "battery...lasts for 7,500 page turns."  However, Amazon's e-book format is proprietary, and will not work on non-Kindle readers, such as Sony's.</p>

<p>Do you or have you ever used an electronic book reader? Do you see advantages or disadvantages to them? Do you think most people would be willing to move to reading books on a device such as one of these readers?</p>

<p><br />
Cited article: <br />
Stone, B. (2007, September 6). Are books passe?: Web giants envision the next chapter. <em>The New York                   Times</em>, pp. C1, C9.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/09/are_printed_books_passe.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/09/are_printed_books_passe.html</guid>
         <category>Emerging Technologies</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:56:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Protecting your privacy by giving it away</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-06/ps_transparency">http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/15-06/ps_transparency<br />
</a><br />
Professor falsely accused of being a terrorist decides the best way to protect himself in the future is to document his entire life online, so there's no confusion about what he's doing.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/05/protecting_your_privacy_by_giv.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/05/protecting_your_privacy_by_giv.html</guid>
         <category>Privacy/Identity Theft</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:09:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Biggest customer information theft ever</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><em>45 Million Card Numbers Stolen From Retailer</em></p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-TJX-Security-Breach.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin">http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-TJX-Security-Breach.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin</a><br />
(if this link disappears, search the title phrase in the database: LexisNexis)</p>

<p>Nothing that hasn't happened before, but the scale of this is enormous - theoretically this could affect 1 in every 8 people in the United States. How can we protect ourselves from this type of breach? Should we rely on businesses and/or the government, or do we have to do it ourselves?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/03/biggest_customer_information_t.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/03/biggest_customer_information_t.html</guid>
         <category>Privacy/Identity Theft</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:46:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>RIAA to sue college students?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This seems to creep up in the news a few times a year. The RIAA publicly announces their intention to pursue illegal downloading cases focusing mainly on students on college campuses. What would you do if you got such a letter? Would you admit you've been downloading illegally and pay the fine or just ignore them? What do you think?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/02/28/music.college.reut/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/02/28/music.college.reut/index.html</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/03/riaa_to_sue_college_students.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/03/riaa_to_sue_college_students.html</guid>
         <category>Intellectual Property/Copyright</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:49:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Jonathan Lethem on plagiarism and culture</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Harper's magazine recently published <a href="http://harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html">this piece</a> by author Jonathan Lethem. Here's a quote to give you an idea of where he's coming from:</p>

<p>"The kernel, the soul—let us go further and say the substance, the bulk, the actual and valuable material of all human utterances—is plagiarism. "</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/jonathan_lethem_on_plagiarism_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/jonathan_lethem_on_plagiarism_1.html</guid>
         <category>Intellectual Property/Copyright</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:43:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Steve Jobs says he&apos;d like to sell DRM-free music</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/">Apple news</a> posting, Steve Jobs outlined his company's position on the future of selling music online - it's very interesting, and promising if he really means it. Could this be a step away from the era of ridiculous downloading lawsuits?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/steve_jobs_says_hed_like_to_se_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/steve_jobs_says_hed_like_to_se_1.html</guid>
         <category>Intellectual Property/Copyright</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:38:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Gorby back in the news?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Not only does the last Soviet leader and current charitable foundation guru Mikhail Gorbachev make it into the news, he does it by begging Windows magnate Bill Gates in an open letter to show mercy for Aleksandr Ponosov, a Russian school principal who is accused of knowingly buying computers with pirated Windows software for his impoverished school:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/02/05/gorbachev.gates.reut/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/02/05/gorbachev.gates.reut/index.html</a></p>

<p>Should school officials and teachers in impoverished regions of the world be able to circumvent copyright in order to attempt to bridge the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_divide">Digital Divide</a>? Do you think appealing to Bill Gates himself is appropriate? Shouldn't this be pursued in a court of law instead of playing out in front of the court of public opinon?</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/gorby_back_in_the_news.html</link>
         <guid>http://liblogs.albany.edu/infolitnews/2007/02/gorby_back_in_the_news.html</guid>
         <category>Digital Divide</category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 16:28:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
